* MVP of a signal messenger test
* Add minimal signal test unit tests
* Add Signal test to the im nettest group
* Add test for https://sfu.voip.signal.org/
* Fix bug in client-side determination of blocking status
* Add uptime.signal.org to the test targets
* Add more tests
* Check for invalid CA being passed
* Check that the update function works as expected
* Update internal/engine/experiment/signal/signal_test.go
Co-authored-by: Simone Basso <bassosimone@gmail.com>
* fix: back out URL we shouldn't have changed
When merging probe-engine into probe-cli, we changed too many URLs
and some of them should not have been changed.
I noticed this during the review of Signal and I choose to add
this commit to revert such changes.
While there, make sure the URL of the experiment is OK.
* fix(signal): reach 100% of coverage
Just so that we can focus on areas of the codebase where we need
more coverage, let us avoid missing an easy line to test.
Co-authored-by: Simone Basso <bassosimone@gmail.com>
* chore: remove duplicate code of conduct
* chore: remove AUTHORS file
I doubt this actually has any value in the era of GitHub.
* chore: move CODEOWNERS to toplevel
* chore: move CONTRIBUTING.md to toplevel and adapt it
* chore: remove duplicated LICENSE file
* chore(engine): remove now-obsolete design document
* chore: remove the testusing test
We're not going to make this code importable from third parties
like we did for probe-engine. It seems this feature was only used
for the experiment in Spain so it makes sense to drop it.
* chore: enable code generation tests
See https://github.com/ooni/probe/issues/1335
* chore: enable code-ql checks
* cleanup: remove libooniffi code and tests
It seems this code is not used. We are not aware of anyone using it. And we
don't want to expose it publicly as an API. So, what to do?
I guess it's fine to delete it. If there is anyone that needs it, we have
in the history a reference to it and we can always reinstate it.
* chore: move issue templates to ooni/probe
* refactor: move more commands to internal/cmd
Part of https://github.com/ooni/probe/issues/1335.
We would like all commands to be at the same level of engine
rather than inside engine (now that we can do it).
* fix: update .gitignore
* refactor: also move jafar outside engine
* We should be good now?
* refactor: miniooni should be outside of the engine
This is part of https://github.com/ooni/probe/issues/1335. We also need
to think whether we wanna keep libminiooni and miniooni separated.
The previous use case for having a top-level libminiooni was that of
enabling others to integrate miniooni into other binaries.
This was usegul when studying internet censorship in Spain in May 2020.
I am wondering whether we should be keeping this complexity. I am not
sure about this and probably we should be killing it.
(In any case, reducing complexity is not the objective of this diff,
since I would like instead to move things around with minimal changes
and make sure we have a ~good repository organization here.)
* fix: import in libminiooni
* refactor: start building an Android package
Part of https://github.com/ooni/probe/issues/1335.
This seems also a good moment to move some packages out of the
engine, e.g., oonimkall. This package, for example, is a consumer
of the engine, so it makes sense it's not _inside_ it.
* fix: committed some stuff I didn't need to commit
* fix: oonimkall needs to be public to build
The side effect is that we will probably need to bump the major
version number every time we change one of these APIs.
(We can also of course choose to violate the basic guidelines of Go
software, but I believe this is bad form.)
I have no problem in bumping the major quite frequently and in
any case this monorepo solution is convinving me more than continuing
to keep a split between engine and cli. The need to embed assets to
make the probe more reliable trumps the negative effects of having to
~frequently bump major because we expose a public API.
* fix: let's not forget about libooniffi
Honestly, I don't know what to do with this library. I added it
to provide a drop in replacement for MK but I have no idea whether
it's used and useful. I would not feel comfortable exposing it,
unlike oonimkall, since we're not using it.
It may be that the right thing to do here is just to delete the
package and reduce the amount of code we're maintaining?
* woops, we're still missing the publish android script
* fix(publish-android.bash): add proper API key
* ouch fix another place where the name changed
This diff is part of https://github.com/ooni/probe/issues/1335.
We are moving more probe-engine workflows to toplevel.
The general idea here is to migrate all possible workflows and to
delete the ones that we cannot use in this repo (if any).
* refactor: build miniooni from toplevel
Of course, also move the specific test checking whether we are
still able of building miniooni.
Part of https://github.com/ooni/probe/issues/1335
* build for current branch just to confirm
* fix: correct the path where linux/arm binary is
* okay, it works, we can remove the special rule
This is how I did it:
1. `git clone https://github.com/ooni/probe-engine internal/engine`
2. ```
(cd internal/engine && git describe --tags)
v0.23.0
```
3. `nvim go.mod` (merging `go.mod` with `internal/engine/go.mod`
4. `rm -rf internal/.git internal/engine/go.{mod,sum}`
5. `git add internal/engine`
6. `find . -type f -name \*.go -exec sed -i 's@/ooni/probe-engine@/ooni/probe-cli/v3/internal/engine@g' {} \;`
7. `go build ./...` (passes)
8. `go test -race ./...` (temporary failure on RiseupVPN)
9. `go mod tidy`
10. this commit message
Once this piece of work is done, we can build a new version of `ooniprobe` that
is using `internal/engine` directly. We need to do more work to ensure all the
other functionality in `probe-engine` (e.g. making mobile packages) are still WAI.
Part of https://github.com/ooni/probe/issues/1335
Arturo Filastò
Simone Basso