# llldap > [!IMPORTANT] > You may be looking for [lldap](https://github.com/lldap/lldap) instead, a more mature solution with a different feature set. Is your *Lightweight Directory Access Protocol* server too heavy and too cumbersome? If your lldap not light enough or are you looking for a solution which supports [virtualhosts](https://github.com/lldap/lldap/issues/1196#issuecomment-3036760574) and [multiple-value attributes](https://github.com/lldap/lldap/issues/1133) such as mail aliases? **llldap might be just for you!*** > [!WARNING] > This is not production-ready yet. ## Building By default, building the binary expects to have the `assets` and `templates` folder in the same folder as the binary, as is useful during development. If you'd like to build a portable binary that embeds the assets and templates, you need to add the `embed` feature flag, for which you need to disable the default `noembed` feature: ```shell cargo build --release --features embed,http --no-default-features # My binary now contains everything and can be copied to a remote server scp target/release/llldap .......... ``` ## Comparison to lldap Compared to lldap, llldap: - does not use an SQLite database, but simple text files - does not use GraphQL to build an API, and therefore does not require custom logic in the client (JS/WASM) - supports virtualhosts out-of-the-box - supports mailalias with multiple values in search queries - support listening on unix domain sockets (UDS) out-of-the-box ## Design > [!IMPORTANT] > Most of these design decisions have not been implemented yet. - different users can have the same username across different domains, so `foo@bar.com` is not the same user as `foo@baz.com` - service accounts are separated from normal user accounts, and do not have an associated domain; they allow 3rd-party programs to connect via LDAP with special sets of permissions - service groups are separated from normal user groups, and do not have an associated domain; they are meant to store permissions (eg. `admins`, or `mail`) - aliases are supported, but remain associated with a user account forever ([more details](docs/aliases.md)) - TODO: should users be able to create custom groups/aliases? that sounds useful, but may need monitoring to prevent accidental/malicious abuse (such as registering `comptabilité@` or `legalteam@`) ## Potential future features We may explore in the future: - domain mapping (eg. .org/.fr/.onion) - optional complete logging of all activity - 2-factor auth - Shamir's secret sharing social account recovery - Permission to create invites on an account - i18n domains (punycode) - i18n user identifiers (TODO: check compatibility with other tools) see [this IETF draft](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mailmaint-interoperable-addresses) - RTL languages - hierarchical groups - fine-grained permissions (RBAC) - running with different async runtimes - implying base DN from HTTP HOST header (to have `auth.a.localhost` and `auth.b.localhost` where users can login without adding the domain part) - making the core logic reusable as a library for custom LDAP behavior - per-user/domain data retention policies to keep logs of login attempts - per-domain admins ## License [GNU AGPL v3](LICENSE)