refactor(webconnectivity@v0.5): improve logging clarity (#964)
We're bumping the experiment's version number because we changed the name of the field used to contain late/duplicate DNS responses. We have also changed the algorithm to determine `#dnsDiff`. However, the change should only impact how we log this information. Overall, here the idea is to provide users with a reasonably clear explanation of how the probe maps observations to blocking and accessible using expected/unexpected as the conceptual framework. Part of https://github.com/ooni/probe/issues/2237
This commit is contained in:
parent
d6a362d96f
commit
5e76c6ec92
9 changed files with 88 additions and 33 deletions
|
|
@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ func (tk *TestKeys) analysisToplevel(logger model.Logger) {
|
|||
tk.Blocking = "dns"
|
||||
tk.Accessible = false
|
||||
logger.Warnf(
|
||||
"ANOMALY: flags=%d accessible=%+v, blocking=%+v",
|
||||
"ANOMALY: flags=%d, accessible=%+v, blocking=%+v",
|
||||
tk.BlockingFlags, tk.Accessible, tk.Blocking,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -117,14 +117,14 @@ func (tk *TestKeys) analysisToplevel(logger model.Logger) {
|
|||
tk.Blocking = "tcp_ip"
|
||||
tk.Accessible = false
|
||||
logger.Warnf(
|
||||
"ANOMALY: flags=%d accessible=%+v, blocking=%+v",
|
||||
"ANOMALY: flags=%d, accessible=%+v, blocking=%+v",
|
||||
tk.BlockingFlags, tk.Accessible, tk.Blocking,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
case (tk.BlockingFlags & (analysisFlagTLSBlocking | analysisFlagHTTPBlocking)) != 0:
|
||||
tk.Blocking = "http-failure"
|
||||
tk.Accessible = false
|
||||
logger.Warnf("ANOMALY: flags=%d accessible=%+v, blocking=%+v",
|
||||
logger.Warnf("ANOMALY: flags=%d, accessible=%+v, blocking=%+v",
|
||||
tk.BlockingFlags, tk.Accessible, tk.Blocking,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ func (tk *TestKeys) analysisToplevel(logger model.Logger) {
|
|||
tk.Blocking = "http-diff"
|
||||
tk.Accessible = false
|
||||
logger.Warnf(
|
||||
"ANOMALY: flags=%d accessible=%+v, blocking=%+v",
|
||||
"ANOMALY: flags=%d, accessible=%+v, blocking=%+v",
|
||||
tk.BlockingFlags, tk.Accessible, tk.Blocking,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ func (tk *TestKeys) analysisToplevel(logger model.Logger) {
|
|||
tk.Blocking = false
|
||||
tk.Accessible = true
|
||||
logger.Infof(
|
||||
"ACCESSIBLE: flags=%d accessible=%+v, blocking=%+v",
|
||||
"ACCESSIBLE: flags=%d, accessible=%+v, blocking=%+v",
|
||||
tk.BlockingFlags, tk.Accessible, tk.Blocking,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue